#98: obiwan on photography
It's been exactly a year since my religious conversion .... from film photography to digital. It's more a repertoire expansion than a conversion or an upgrade. My film camera will stay with me (although it felt odd in my hands after a year in exile).
Now a few words of advice to my readers (the 2 of them) who may be thinking of going digital.

Now a few words of advice to my readers (the 2 of them) who may be thinking of going digital.

- There are tons of good cameras out there .... from the slick aim-and-shoot, to the fixed zoom, to the now-affordable digital SLRs. I have trusted the advice of a few professional reviews before baring my wallet. And they have delivered good wisdom. If you are in the same boat, I personally recommend Digital Camera Resource, Digital Photography Review, and Digital Picture (for Canon products).
- It's not in the mega-pixels. Contrary to sales pitches, ramping up pixels do not give you better or sharper images. They may just do the reverse. Don't take my word for it. Read this, "The myth about megapixels" in the NY Times.
- The magic is in the lens. The range from less than a $100 to a couple of thousand for just that glass should tell you that there is a serious difference. Lenses bundled with SLR kits are the bottom of the line; let's just say they take pictures. Investing in a good lens is worth it, and definitely a lot more than ramping up the pixels.
- Packing in a large zoom range has trade-offs. The images suffer from distortions and softness, and they forgo lens speed. Some have image stabilisers built in. But there's only that much they can compensate for. And they cannot help if your objects are in motion – think of people or wild-life. So don't get greedy on the range.
- Third party lenses (Sigma or Tamron) are a hit-and-miss. You could get a terrific match with your camera and at a fraction of the cost of camera brands. How good is your luck? My advice: accessorise gradually.
Labels: news, photographie, technologie










